Williams v Roffey Bros (1991) established that practical benefits can constitute valid consideration. The facts involved Roffey Bros agreeing to pay extra to Williams for timely carpentry work. The case clarified that avoiding a penalty or securing timely performance can justify additional payments.
Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd
Practical Benefit as Consideration: The court recognised that a practical benefit, such as avoiding penalties, can constitute valid consideration for a contract variation, even if no new legal obligation is created.
