Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) reinforced the equitable principle and ruled that an executory agreement for a lease is as binding as a formal lease. The court held that tenants under such agreements are subject to the same rights and obligations, including the right of distress for unpaid rent.
This case law note has been reviewed by a law tutor
🏛️ Court: Court of Appeal 🗓️ Judgment Date: 29 March 1882 🗂️ Where Reported: (1882) 21 Ch. D. 9; [1882] 3 WLUK 102 📍 Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
⚖️ Legal Principles
1️⃣
Equitable Lease Doctrine: The court ruled that an executory agreement for a lease is as binding as an actual lease, meaning tenants are treated as if they hold a formal lease, with all associated rights and obligations. It set a precedent that executory contracts, when accompanied by actions that demonstrate the parties' commitment to the terms (such as taking possession and fulfilling payment obligations), are as binding as formalised agreements.