Starson v Swayze (2003) addressed patient autonomy and mental health in Canada. It confirmed that individuals have the right to refuse medical treatment if they are deemed competent, impacting legal interpretations of consent and capacity in mental health jurisprudence.
This case law note has been reviewed by a law tutor
🏛️ Court: Supreme Court of Canada 🗓️ Judgment Date: 6 June 2003 🗂️ Where Reported: [2003] SCC 32 📍 Jurisdiction: Canada
⚖️ Legal Principles
1️⃣
Competency and Autonomy: The Supreme Court of Canada reinforced that competency is determined by the ability to understand and appreciate treatment information, underscoring the right of competent individuals to refuse medical treatment even if it contradicts medical advice.