The case of Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Hansen-Tangen (The Diana Prosperity) (1976) considered whether a vessel built at a different shipyard and under a different hull number than specified in the charterparty could be rejected by the charterers.
Also known as: Hansen-Tangen v Sanko Steamship Co Ltd, The Diana Prosperity
✅
This case law note has been reviewed by a law tutor
🏛️ Court: House of Lords 🗓️ Judgment Date: 7 October 1976 🗂️ Where Reported: [1976] 1 W.L.R. 989; [1976] 3 All E.R. 570; [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 621 📍 Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
⚖️ Legal Principles
1️⃣
Contract Interpretation Flexibility: The House of Lords emphasised that commercial contracts should be interpreted in a practical manner, focusing on the contract's purpose rather than adhering to overly technical or rigid interpretations that might distort the parties' intentions.