In Patel v Mirza (2016), the UK Supreme Court tackled the complexities of illegality in contract law, deciding that parties involved in illegal agreements cannot seek to recover their losses. This ruling redefined the boundaries of enforceability and public policy.
This case law note has been reviewed by a law tutor
🏛️ Court: Supreme Court 🗓️ Judgment Date: 20 July 2016 🗂️ Where Reported: [2016] UKSC 42; [2017] A.C. 467; [2016] 3 W.L.R. 399 📍 Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
⚖️ Legal Principles
1️⃣
Illegality Principle:Patel v Mirza clarified that individuals cannot claim restitution if their contract involves illegal activities, reinforcing the principle that the law will not assist those engaged in unlawful conduct.