In Patel v Mirza (2016), the UK Supreme Court tackled the complexities of illegality in contract law, deciding that parties involved in illegal agreements cannot seek to recover their losses. This ruling redefined the boundaries of enforceability and public policy.
Illegality Principle:Patel v Mirza clarified that individuals cannot claim restitution if their contract involves illegal activities, reinforcing the principle that the law will not assist those engaged in unlawful conduct.