Skip to Navigation Skip to Posts Skip to Content
Page v Smith

Page v Smith

Page v Smith (1996) clarified that foreseeability of some harm is sufficient, and specific foreseeability of the exact type of injury (psychiatric or physical) is not necessary. This decision aligns with the principle that a defendant must take their victim as they find them: eggshell skull rule.

Page v Smith - eggshell skull rule - foreseeability - tort - personal injury
Page v Smith