In Kent v Griffiths (2001), the court ruled that ambulance services owe a duty of care to patients. The case involved an avoidable delay that led to severe consequences for the claimant. This decision ascertained that once emergency services accept a call, they must act reasonably to prevent harm.
This case law note has been reviewed by a law tutor
🏛️ Court: Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 🗓️ Judgment Date: 3 February 2000 🗂️ Where Reported: [2001] Q.B. 36; [2000] 2 W.L.R. 1158; [2000] 2 All E.R. 474 📍 Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
⚖️ Legal Principles
1️⃣
Duty of Care for Ambulance Services: Ambulance services are legally obligated to provide prompt care once they accept a call. Failing to respond within a reasonable time can lead to liability if the patient suffers harm as a result of the delay.