Hryniak v Mauldin (2014) is a Canadian Supreme Court case that involved complex allegations of civil fraud which reshaped summary judgment rules. It ruled on access to justice, streamlining procedures to avoid lengthy trials when evidence supports a swift decision.
Access to Justice and Proportionality: The Supreme Court established that access to justice requires timely and affordable resolutions. Proportionality is crucial, ensuring that procedures are appropriate for the case's complexity, balancing thoroughness with efficiency to facilitate fair outcomes without unnecessary expense.
