Skip to Navigation Skip to Posts Skip to Content
Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman

Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman

Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman (1990) established that auditors owe no duty of care to shareholders or potential investors for the accuracy of company accounts, while limiting auditors' liability to shareholders collectively, not individually or to potential investors.

On this page
Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman - company - auditors - duty of care - shareholders 2
Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman